Tunguska uprising. An excerpt characterizing the Tunguska uprising

On this day, February 13, the Tungus detachments repel an attempt by the Soviet units to break through to Oymyakon. In 1924-1925, the so-called Tungus uprising took place - an armed uprising of rebels from representatives of the indigenous peoples of the North in Yakutia and the regions of the North-East, caused by unjustified actions of local authorities.

Tunguska rebel movement in 1924-1925. covered the Okhotsk coast and the eastern regions of the YASSR. The main reason for its emergence was the separation of the Okhotsk Territory from Yakutia in April 1922 and its transfer to the Primorsky and Kamchatka regions. As a result, at a time when a new military-political line was being pursued in Yakutia under the conditions of the NEP, on the Okhotsk coast, the local party and Soviet leadership and the OGPU bodies continued to pursue a policy of terror against the local population. Forcing them to pay exorbitant taxes, the security officers cracked down on peaceful hunters with machine-gun fire. Aboriginal people were shamelessly robbed, setting exorbitant “taxes” for literally everything: for killed game, weapons, firewood, dogs, peeled tree bark, etc. Things got to the point that they began to take the old debts established by the White Guards in 1919-1923. Representatives of the Soviet government did not know the language of the Tungus, life, customs. There were no national schools, there was not a single native in the state institutions.

On May 10, 1924, the rebels under the leadership of M.K. Artemiev occupied the village of Nelkan. Captured Soviet workers A.V. Yakulovsky, F.F. Popov, Koryakin were released. On June 6, the rebels numbering 60 people under the leadership of the Tungus P. Karamzin and the Yakut M.K. Artemyev, after an 18-hour battle, captured the port of Ayan. During the battle, the head of the OGPU, Suvorov, and three Red Army soldiers were killed, and the surrendered garrison was released by the Tungus and sent to Yakutia.

In June 1924, in Nelkan, the rebels convened a congress of the Ayan-Nelkan, Okhotsk-Ayan and Maimakan Tunguses and Yakuts. It elected the Provisional Central Tunguska National Administration, which decided to secede from Soviet Russia and form an independent state. M.K. Artemyev was elected chief of staff of the armed detachments, and P. Karamzin was appointed head of all the Tungus detachments.

On July 14, 1924, the All-Tungus congress of the Okhotsk coast with adjacent areas was held in Ayan, declaring the independence of the Tungus people and the inviolability of its territory with sea, forest, mountain riches and resources. The leaders of the movement of different nationalities M.K. Artemyev, P. Karamzin, S. Kanin, I. Koshelev, G.Ya. Fedorov and others, 10 people in all, compiled an “Appeal” to the world community. It talked about the fact that the Tungus, backward “in all respects from the world progress of science and technology”, turn to foreign states and the League of Nations, “as to powerful defenders of small nationalities on a global scale” on the issue of saving them from the “common enemy of the world nationalism - Russian communism". Such a formulation of the problem by the leadership of the movement indicates a fairly mature level of political self-awareness and socio-political views. It is interesting to compare the point of view of the leaders of the movement with the opinion of the modern American scientist D. Davids, who wrote that "nationalism, and only nationalism, is an effective barrier to communism."

Flag of the Tunguska Republic

The rebels created the attributes of their national-territorial formation. For example, they adopted the tricolor flag of the “Tunguska Republic”. The white color of the flag symbolized the Siberian snow, green - the forest, taiga, black - the earth. It also adopted its own anthem.

Thus, this movement was not a criminal one, since its leaders were political oppositionists who rallied around specific socio-political ideas. The rebel leadership was well acquainted with legislative and philosophical sources. This is evidenced by their demands for national self-determination, individual rights, the rights of small ethnic groups, the creation of an independent national-territorial entity, and so on. The reason for the dissatisfaction of the rebels was the inequality of the rights of large and small peoples in the creation of a national-territorial federation. Tungus, being under the authority of the authorized Far Eastern Revolutionary Committee for the Okhotsk district V.A. Abramov, experienced the policy of terror of the era of “war communism” at the height of the NEP.

In addition to political demands, the rebels put forward demands of an economic and cultural nature. For example, they suggested restoring the old routes: Yakutsk - Okhotsk, Nelkan - Ayan and Nelkan - Ust-Maya. That is, they sought to establish former economic ties with Yakutia. In addition, a set of measures was developed for the economic and cultural development of the Okhotsk coast zone.

The Provisional Central Tunguska National Directorate warned the Central Executive Committee of the USSR that: “In the event of the landing of military units of Soviet troops on our shores of the Sea of \u200b\u200bOkhotsk and an invasion through the borders of the neighboring republics of the Far East and the Yakut autonomy, we, the Tunguska nation, as completely rebelled because of intolerant the politicians of the Bolsheviks will have to offer armed resistance as proof of our deep indignation and we will be sure that for the possible victims, all responsibility for the shed innocent blood before history and public opinion will fall on you as the highest organ of Soviet power, which allowed violence. Consequently, the participants in the movement did not at all want bloodshed and wanted to resolve the urgent conflict through peaceful negotiations. This is also evidenced by the facts of the release of captured Red Army soldiers and Soviet employees.

But in September 1924, a detachment of the Okhotsk OGPU near the village of Ulya shot three Russian fishermen, two Tungus and one Yakut. In response, armed self-defence units began to organize everywhere. Grouping M.K. Artemyeva without a fight took possession located 315 km. from Yakutsk, the village of Petropavlovsk, Ust-Maisky district. "The centers of the insurrection in the North of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic became more active: Oymyakonsky, Verkhoyansky, Abysky (Elgetsky) and other uluses. On December 31, 1924, the rebels captured the settlement of Arka, and then New Ustye, located in km from Okhotsk.

The rebels confiscated the goods of the Nelkan branch of the Hudson Bay company and appointed Yu. Galibarov as the head of the military-civilian warehouse. At Novy Ustye they got up to 10,000 poods of food worth 100,000 rubles, in Oymyakon - various goods worth about 25,000 rubles, in Abyye - furs worth 25,000 rubles. In the occupied areas, the shops and warehouses of Yakutpushnina, the Kholbos cooperative, and other economic and trade organizations were in the hands of the rebels. There were cases of robberies of the civilian population, when horses, food supplies, and hay were taken away.

General Secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks I.V. Stalin sent instructions to the authorized representative of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee and the Central Committee K.K. Baikalov, who led the liquidation of the Tunguska rebellion. It said: “The Central Committee, taking into account all the above considerations, finds it expedient to peacefully liquidate the uprising, using military forces only if this is dictated by necessity ...”. A commission consisting of P.I. was sent from Yakutsk to conduct peace negotiations. Orosina, A.V. Davydov and P. Filippov, who was present at the second Tunguska congress in January 1925. This delegation informed the audience about political life in Yakutia and about new Soviet construction in general, but the congress was very distrustful of their reports. Such distrust was explained by the fact that the Tungus did not see them as a legal entity that could have significance and weight in politics. Therefore, the population considered the members of the delegation to be of little authority and quite reasonably asked: "Can yesterday's rebel give someone a firm amnesty?"

The Tunguska congress, through a peaceful delegation, submitted to the YATsIK of the YASSR the demands for: 1) the separation of the Okhotsk coast from the Far East and joining Yakutia; 2) granting the right to the Tungus themselves to resolve political, economic and cultural issues; 3) removal from power of the communists who pursued a policy of terror. During the negotiations, hostilities were temporarily suspended, but under pressure from the Siberian Revolutionary Committee, the Aldan-Nelkan cavalry detachment of I.Ya. Strode suddenly captured Petropavlovsk, thus violating the truce.

In May 1925, during the peace negotiations between M.K. Artemyev and I.Ya. Strodom, R.F. Kulakovsky, both sides managed to find a common language. M.K. Artemiev became convinced that the leaders of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic were not those communists who pursued a policy of terror; a national revival is being carried out in the republic and the issue of joining Tungusia to the YASSR is at the stage of discussion. As a result of successful negotiations, on May 9, a peace agreement was concluded and the detachment of M.K. Artemyeva "unanimously decided to lay down arms." On July 18, a detachment of P. Karamzin in the area of the Bear's Head, located 50 km. from Okhotsk, joined the peaceful surrender. In total, 484 rebels from the detachment of M.K. laid down their arms. Artemiev and 35 rebels of P. Karamzin's group.

On August 10, a congress of the Tungus of the Okhotsk coast opened in Okhotsk, which was attended by representatives of 21 Tungus clans and three Yakut regions. They adopted a resolution on trade, hunting and fishing, health care, and public education. Particular attention was paid to the organization of clan councils.

On August 25, 1925, the “Main Tunguska National Directorate” through an act expressed the wish that the national self-determination of the Tunguska people be secured by decisions made by the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of the USSR, the Council of Nationalities of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR and the Central Executive Committee of the RSFSR. The adoption of such a resolution would make it possible to stop the fragmentation of a single Tungus ethnic group between various administrative entities, such as the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, Primorsky and Kamchatka regions. They considered their fragmented state as a “product of monarchist politics”. The main goal of the participants in the movement was the unification of the Tungus people and its entry as an independent national unit into the autonomous Yakutia.

However, the center, and especially the organs of the OGPU-NKVD, did not share such views and constantly suspected the Yakuts and Tungus of “Japanophilism”. In 1925 M.K. Ammosov anxiously reported to his friends in Yakutsk that "in the depths of the Central Committee (Stalin and others) they are extremely distrustful of us, referring us to the category of communists degenerating into bourgeois revolutionaries." F.G. spoke about the same. Sivtsev: "Sedition is not the property of the population, but it is created by unhealthy methods, excessive suspicion, party underdevelopment and national bad manners."

The further fate of the rebels is tragic - some time later, from 1927 until the beginning of World War II, they were subjected to repressions, many of them were shot. Probably, the same tragic fate befell Pavel Gavrilovich Karamzin (pictured second from the left in the top row).

The biography of Pavel Gavrilovich Karamzin before the moment of participation in the insurgent movement and after is unknown (probably classified by the OGPU bodies without a statute of limitations). From a few historical documents, it is known that Pavel Karamzin came from an Evenk princely family, presumably from the Ayano-Maisky district of the Khabarovsk Territory.

Based on the publication of E.P. Antonova, Ph.D.

90 years ago, the Tungus and Yakuts turned to the League of Nations with a request to save them from communism
Article by Arman Marashetsi with my abbreviations, editing and additions.

Exactly 90 years ago, on February 13, 1925, a forgotten historical event took place - a major battle between the Tunguska rebels and the Soviet authorities. The armed uprising of the indigenous peoples of the North under the leadership of the Yakut Mikhail Artemiev and the Tungus Pavel Karamzin went down in history as the "Tunguska uprising" and swept through the years 1924-1928. all the Okhotsk coast and the eastern regions of Yakutia.

On the left photo - Mikhail Artemyev. On the right - a group of commanders of the Tunguska detachments ( P.G. Karamzin - second from the left in the top row). The biography of Pavel Gavrilovich Karamzin is almost unknown. However, few surviving documents indicate that he came from an Evenk princely family, presumably from the Ayano-Maisky district of the Khabarovsk Territory.

This uprising of the Yakuts and Tungus (Evenks) against the Soviet regime was by no means the first.

Back in 1921, an uprising broke out in the Ayano-Maisky district. The uprising was led by the Yakut G.V. Efimov, but Russian White Guards also took part in it under the leadership of the cornet Mikhail Korobeinikov. The rebels organized the Yakut Regional Administration, the Yakut rebel army was created. In 1922, the YAO applied asking for helpto the Merkulov brothers, who ruled in Vladivostok (until October 1922, Primorsky Krai was the last enclave of Russia not conquered by the Bolsheviks), but they did not receive help. However, whenThe Merkulovs were displaced by General M.K. Yakutia also had access to the Sea of Okhotsk).

Generals M. Dietrichs (left) and A. Pepelyaev (right)

After landing, the Pepelyaev detachment went to Yakutsk. As a result of his defeat in March 1923, Pepelyaev was forced to retreat towards the coast. In the summer of 1923, Pepelyaev was defeated. Only parts of his army, led by Colonels Sivkov, Anders, Stepan and Leonov, survived. Part of the army (230 soldiers and 103 officers), led by Pepelyaev, surrendered.

In addition to the detachment of Pepelyaev, since 1920, an insurgent detachment led by Captain Yanygin was in Okhotsk. In 1921, reinforcements came to them - a detachment of Bochkarev that arrived from Vladivostok. In the fall of 1922, the arrival of General Vasily Rakitin took over the leadership of the detachment. In the same year, Rakitin's detachment went to Yakutsk, with the exception of Captain Mikhailovsky's detachment, which remained in the city. In the summer of that year, Okhotsk fell. Yanygin managed to escape, General Rakitin died.

Now back to the Tunguska uprising of 1924-1925.

The main reasons for the uprising are considered to be the separation of the Okhotsk Territory from Yakutia in April 1922 with the transfer to the Primorsky and Kamchatka regions, as well as the closure of ports for foreign trade, interruptions in the importation of goods from the mainland, the confiscation of deer from private owners, the seizure of vast pastures for industrial new buildings and other arbitrariness of the Soviet authorities. On the coast of Okhotsk, the local OGPU terrorized the local population, forcing them to pay exorbitant taxes, shamelessly robbing literally everything: for game, weapons, firewood, dogs, peeled tree bark, etc. Things got to the point that they began to take the old debts established by the White Guards in 1919-1923. In addition, representatives of the Soviet government did not know the language of the Tungus, life, customs. There were no national schools, there was not a single native in the state institutions.

In May 1924, the rebels under the leadership of M.K. Artemiev occupied the village of Nelkan. On June 6, 60 rebels captured the port of Ayan after an 18-hour battle. During the battle, the head of the OGPU, Suvorov, and three Red Army soldiers were killed, and the surrendered garrison was released by the Tungus and sent to Yakutia.

A congress of the Ayan-Nelkan, Okhotsk-Ayan and Maimakan Tunguses and Yakuts was convened in Nelkan. It elected the Provisional Central Tunguska National Administration, which decided to secede from Soviet Russia and form an independent state. M.K. Artemyev was elected chief of staff of the armed detachments, and P. Karamzin was appointed head of all the Tungus detachments.

Flag of the Tunguska Republic

The rebels created the attributes of their national-territorial formation. They adopted the tricolor flag of the “Tunguska Republic”: white symbolized the Siberian snow, green - the forest, taiga, black - the earth. It also adopted its own anthem.

All this refutes the assertions of Soviet authors that the named uprising was criminal. The leaders of the uprising were political oppositionists who rallied around specific socio-political ideas. The rebel leadership was well acquainted with legislative and philosophical sources.

This is evidenced by their demands for national self-determination, individual rights, the rights of small ethnic groups, the creation of an independent national-territorial entity, and so on. The reason for the dissatisfaction of the rebels was the inequality of the rights of large and small peoples in the creation of a national-territorial federation.

Tungus, being under the authority of the authorized V.A. Abramov, experienced the policy of terror of the “war communism” era. In addition to political demands, the rebels put forward demands of an economic and cultural nature. For example, they suggested restoring the old routes: Yakutsk - Okhotsk, Nelkan - Ayan and Nelkan - Ust-Maya. That is, they sought to establish former economic ties with Yakutia. In addition, a set of measures was developed for the economic and cultural development of the Okhotsk coast zone.

The immediate reason for the uprising was the execution in September 1924 by a detachment of the Okhotsk OGPU near the village of Ulya of three Russian fishermen, two Tungus and one Yakut. In response, armed self-defense units began to organize everywhere. According to various studies, the M.K. Artemyeva without a fight took possession located 315 km. from Yakutsk by the village of Petropavlovsk, Ust-Maisky district. At the same time, pockets of rebellion in the North of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic became more active: Oymyakonsky, Verkhoyansk, Abyisky (Elgetsky) and other uluses. On December 31, 1924, the rebels captured the settlement of Arka, and then New Ustye, located 7 km. from Okhotsk. A group of rebels under the command of G. Rakhmatullin-Bossooyka rushed to Nelkan. Mikhailov's detachment of 40 people went to the East Kangalassky ulus, reading appeals to the people in the Yakut and Russian languages at rural gatherings.

1) the separation of the Okhotsk coast from the Far East and its reunification with Yakutia;
2) granting the right to the Tungus themselves to resolve political, economic and cultural issues;
3) removal from power of the communists who pursued a policy of terror.

In order to fight the rebels, the III Extraordinary Session of the Yakut Central Executive Committee was convened. On it, the secretary of the regional committee Baikalov K.K., the rebels were called bandits, and their leaders - "elements drugged by the illusion."

Stalin sent an instruction to Baikalov, who led the operation to "eliminate the Tunguska rebellion" in which it was said: "The Central Committee considers it expedient to peacefully liquidate the uprising, using military forces only if it is dictated by necessity ...".

In May 1925, during the peace negotiations, the parties managed to find a common language. M.K. Artemiev became convinced that the leaders of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic were not those communists who pursued a policy of terror; a national revival is being carried out in the republic and the issue of joining Tungusia to the Yakut ASSR is under discussion. As a result of successful negotiations, on May 9, a peace agreement was concluded and the detachment of M.K. Artemyeva "unanimously decided to lay down arms." On July 18, a detachment of P. Karamzin in the area of the Bear's Head, located 50 km. from Okhotsk, joined the peaceful surrender. In total, 484 rebels from the detachment of M.K. laid down their arms. Artemiev and 35 rebels of P. Karamzin's group. Considering that the main goal of the "military demonstration" - propaganda of the political program of the party, was achieved and, at the same time, realizing the passivity of the bulk of the population, P. Ksenofontov surrendered to the authorities and was arrested in K. Baikalov's apartment, believing in the word given by the communists about amnesty.

The last attempt of the Yakuts and Tungus to achieve independence was the Confederalist Uprising of 1927-1928.

The uprising was planned to start on September 15, but the start of mass repressions, provoked by the denunciation of P. D. Yakovlev (Deputy People's Commissar of Internal Trade of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic), interfered with the plans of the leaders of the uprising. Despite the repression, many prominent rebels, including Artemiev, managed to elude the Chekists. On September 16, the creation of an insurgent detachment began under the leadership of Pavel Ksenofontov, S. Mikhailov and P. Omorusov.

Pavel Vasilievich Ksenofontov

Born into a wealthy Yakut family. Graduated from the Faculty of Law of Moscow University.Like a number of other Yakut intellectuals, he advocated raising the status of the Yakut ASSR to a union republic, separating the Communist Party from the state, and providing more self-government to local authorities. He protested against the resettlement of Russian peasants in Yakutia, which led to the deprivation of the Yakuts of land for grazing.The attempts of Ksenofontov and his supporters in 1925-1927 to bring these issues to the discussion of the district and republican party congresses were not successful due to the opposition of the party leaders of Yakutia.Against the backdrop of armed uprisings that began in Yakutia in April 1927, Ksenofontov on September 28, 1927 in the village of Kudoma announced the creation of the “Young Yakut National Soviet Socialist Confederalist Party”. In response to this, the Yakut leadership declared Ksenofontov and his supporters bandits and headed for armed suppression of the rebellion.

On September 28, at the first meeting of the Confederalists, it was decided to hold an “armed demonstration” for the purpose of agitation - a campaign in Yakutia with a call to seek independence.

In October, a detachment of confederalists under the command of Artemyev occupied the village of Petropavlovsk. There, a detachment of 18 Tungus joined the confederalists, and soon a detachment of Mikhailov came to the village. Elections were held, as a result of which Mikhailov became the commander, and Artemiev the chief of staff of the detachment. At the same time, fighting began throughout Yakutia: the village of Pokrovsk was occupied by the Olmarukov detachment, battles were fought in the Yakutsk and Olekminsk districts, the confederalists began hostilities in the Ust-Maisky, Mechinsky and Amginsky uluses.

In order to combat the confederalists, on October 6, the III Extraordinary Session of the Yatsik was convened. On it, the secretary of the Yakut regional committee Baikalov K.K., the confederalists were proclaimed bandits, and their leaders were "drugged by the illusion of elements." According to a decree from the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, all responsibility for suppressing the uprising was assigned to the North-Eastern Expedition of the OGPU.

On November 8, Artemyev's detachment tried to take the village of Abaga, but met with resistance from the pioneers; not wanting to shed blood, Artemiev ordered a retreat. After that, the detachment went to the village of Tabalakh, where the previously captured OGPU agents were released. On November 18, in the village of Dzharala in the West Kangalassky ulus, a shootout took place between part of the OGPU and Mikhailov's detachment.On November 22, in the village of Mytattsy, the detachments of P. Omorusov and I. Kirillov united, numbering 30 and 26 people.

On December 4, a meeting of confederalists was held in the village of Bor, at this meeting Ksenofontov was elected general secretary of the party's Central Committee. P. Omorusov, G. Afanasiev and six other confederalists were elected members of the Central Committee. Ksenofontov's cousin I. Kirillov, as well as M. Artemyev and A. Omorusova became members of the Central Control Commission. Then the Confederalists began to retreat to the village of Petropavlovsk.On December 16, the Confederate troops split up. Mikhailov's detachment of 40 people went to the East Kangalassky ulus. A detachment of Artemiev and Kirillov of 70 people advanced to the Dyupsinsky ulus through the village of Namtsy.

Later in December there was a firefight between the Confederalists and the Red Army, one Red Army soldier was killed. In the village of Kharyyalakh, in the East Kangalassky ulus, another skirmish took place, as a result of which the confederalists lost 7 people killed and retreated to the Maya village. Then Mikhailov's detachment passed through five uluses, reading appeals to the people in the Yakut and Russian languages at rural gatherings. Kirillov's detachment came under attack in the village of Khatyryk. The Confederalists were pursued by the OGPU detachments under the command of Ivan Strod and other commanders. Having united in the Dyupsinsky ulus, the detachments of Mikhailov and Kirillov reached the mouth of the Amga River. Then they separated again: Mikhailov's detachment went in the direction of the Gorny Ulus to connect with Ksenofontov, and the detachment of Artemyev and Kirillov advanced to the settlement of Ust-Aim.

The end of the uprising was tragic.
January 1, 1928 taking into account the fact that rthe leadership of the YASSR more than once turned to Ksenofontov and other leaders of the movement with a proposal to surrender, promising amnesty in this case, as well asbelieving that the goal of the “armed demonstration”, which was to promote the party program, had already been achieved, and also believing the promises of the communists about an amnesty, Ksenofontov went to negotiations, where he was treacherously arrested.At the same time, having received a letter from Ksenofontov, Mikhailov's detachment surrendered on January 27 in the Amginsky ulus.On February 6, the detachment of Artemyev and Kirillov capitulated. The six-month "armed demonstration" is over.

Despite the promise of an amnesty, Pavel Ksenofontov was shot on March 28, 1928, according to an extrajudicial verdict handed down on March 27, 1928 by a "troika" headed by the head of the Special Department of the OGPU, S. V. Puzitsky.

The executioners of Yakutia - Janis Strods (left) and Sergei Puzitsky (right) ... One is a former Latvian, the other is a former Pole.
The Marxist masters of these two watchdogs rated their service accordingly; like many like them, both were shot in 1937.

At the end of March, a special judicial commission of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks headed by Ya. V. Poluyan arrived in Yakutia. 128 people were shot, 130 received various prison sentences, some of them were not connected with the uprising. Among the repressed were prominent representatives of the intelligentsia, many of whom knew nothing about the uprising, and some knew, but at the same time condemned it.In particular, members of the Sakha Omuk society,despite the fact that its members not only condemned the uprising, but even actively fought against the rebel detachments of P. Ksenofontov and M. Artemiev.
In addition, by the decree of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks "On the situation in the Yakut organization of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks", published in August 1928 in the newspaper "Pravda" signed by V. Molotov,positions: Chairman of the YATsIK M. K. Ammosov, Secretary of the Yakut Regional Committee I. N. Barakhov and many othersParty and Soviet workers of Yakutia.

So in the 20th century, the armed struggle of the Yakuts for independence and freedom ended.

In 1924-1925. The civil war in Russia is virtually over. The Soviet Union already existed, the foundations of a new Soviet statehood were being laid. But many of the national outskirts of the country remained restless. This was due to the socio-economic and political processes that took place in the national regions against the backdrop of the establishment of Soviet power. First of all, we are talking about confronting the numerous innovations that the victory of the Bolsheviks in the revolution and civil war brought to the archaic life of the peoples of Central Asia, the Caucasus, Siberia, and the Far East. The course towards the creation of national autonomies, which, as it seemed, was supposed to play an important role in increasing the sympathy of national regions for the central government of the Soviet Union, in fact, contributed to the growth of national self-consciousness even of those peoples who in tsarist Russia were not at all considered serious political actors. . The Soviet national policy was generally controversial and the opinions of researchers - historians and modern politicians still differ radically about whether the reform of its political and administrative division in the early years of Soviet power brought positive or negative consequences to the country.

Causes of the uprising

For several years, armed resistance to the Soviet regime was provided by insurgent detachments operating on the territory of Eastern Siberia. The reasons for the uprisings that broke out in Eastern Siberia were most often not related to the ideological opposition to the communist authorities. As a rule, the dissatisfaction of the population with the policy of the Soviet government in the sphere of economic relations and, in particular, the abuse of official position, which was characteristic of many bosses and "bosses" at the local level, played a role. Although, of course, there were also attempts to give the protest movements a deeper ideological background. As for the social base of the movement, in the first years of Soviet power, the traditional social structure of many peoples of Eastern Siberia had not yet been violated, which retained their tribal way of life and, accordingly, it was on this basis that they could consolidate to oppose the new regional authorities.

Mid 1920s was marked by a major uprising of the indigenous population of the Okhotsk coast and the southeastern regions of Yakutia. The vast region of Yakutia, which included the Aldan, Verkhoyansk, Vilyui, Kolyma, Olekminsky and Yakutsk districts, was inhabited by the Tungus. It should be noted that Tungus in Tsarist Russia and in the first years of Soviet power were traditionally called Evenks, Evens and part of the Yakuts, who lived in close contact with the Evenks. The Tungus population in this region reached 13 thousand people. At the same time, during the period under review, the Tungus, for the most part, retained their traditional way of life and their characteristic social structure. However, according to a number of researchers, in reality, the Tungus population of the region under consideration was rather Yakut. Those Evenks who lived in the region were largely Yakutized and used the Yakut language.

The dissatisfaction of the indigenous population of the region was caused by the separation of the Okhotsk Territory from Yakutia, which followed in April 1922. As a matter of fact, the Okhotsk Territory was assigned to the Kamchatka Region as early as 1910-1911, but until 1922 there were no real borders between Yakutia and the Okhotsk Territory. The Tungus quietly roamed the territory of both the Okhotsk Territory and Yakutia. At the same time, schools and churches were subordinate to Yakutsk, from Yakutia (Lena Territory) Cossacks arrived in the Okhotsk Territory, who served in law enforcement. The situation changed in 1922, after the actual separation from Yakutia. This led to an increase in tension associated with the neglect of the local population by the authorities. If in Yakutia the transition to autonomy was gradually carried out, as a result of which the development of a nationally oriented system of education and culture began, and the Soviet leadership behaved more restrained, then the small Tungus population of the Okhotsk Territory became, literally, a victim of arbitrariness.

First, unlike Yakutia, there were no national educational institutions in the Okhotsk Territory, no language was studied, and the appointed Soviet leaders did not speak it, and most of the Tungus did not know Russian or spoke it with difficulty. In turn, the Tungus were isolated from participation in the activities of government and administration: as the historian E.P. Antonov, not a single Tungus was involved in the service in law enforcement agencies, in government bodies (Antonov E.P. The Tunguska national uprising of 1924-1925 / / Russia and ATR. 2007, No. 4. P. 42). The new Soviet bosses inherited the worst traditions of the Russian pre-revolutionary authorities in the region in terms of impunity for abuses and crimes against local residents. So, the local authorities were engaged in open robbery of the indigenous population, taking away deer, dogs and imposing huge taxes.

The confiscation of deer actually ruined the once prosperous Tungus clans that roamed the territory of the Okhotsk Territory. Many Evenks lost their livelihood - out of a livestock of 40-70-100, or even a thousand deer, people left 10-20 deer each. The deterioration of material well-being was accompanied by constant harassment and bullying by representatives of the authorities, in which, as even the Soviet authorities investigating the situation in the Okhotsk Territory, later admitted, criminal elements were infiltrated. Among them were not only greedy and bribe-takers, but also outright bandits, who before the revolution were engaged in the fraudulent acquisition of furs from the local population. Among the employees of local Soviet authorities were even members of the White Partisan movement, who were later rehabilitated and entered the Soviet service. It is significant that not all of the representatives of the local Soviet authorities participated in the robbery of the local population - some tried to protest, but they themselves risked becoming victims of lawlessness. Therefore, when the indignation among the indigenous population escalated the situation to an extreme point, there was a social explosion. An uprising began against the local authorities.

The beginning of the uprising. Mikhail Artemiev

On May 10, 1924, a detachment of 25-30 rebels captured the village of Nelkan. On the night of June 6, 1924, a detachment of 60 rebels managed to defeat the Soviet garrison of the port of Ayan and capture the settlement and port. It is significant that the Tungus did not demonstrate bloodthirstiness towards Soviet managers - for example, Soviet employees captured in Nelkan were released, and the rebels also released the surrendered garrison of the port of Ayan to Yakutia, having previously disarmed. The rebels did not kill any of the Soviet employees.

In the same June 1924, the initially spontaneous insurrectionary movement began to take on more organized forms. In Nelkan, captured by the rebels, a congress of the Ayan-Nelkan, Okhotsk-Ayan and Maimakan Tunguses was convened, at which its delegates elected the Provisional Central Tunguska National Administration. K. Struchkov was elected chairman of the department, N.M. Dyachkovsky, members of the management -T.I. Ivanov and E.A. Karamzin. As for the military leadership of the rebel detachments, it was carried out by P.V. Karamzin and M.K. Artemiev. Pavel Karamzin was a representative of the extremely influential Tungus princely family in the local areas, therefore he was a kind of symbol of the uprising - the Tungus still had very strong traditional components in their social life, so the presence of people from the princely family at the head of the rebels automatically attracted the broad masses of the Tungus to the side of the latter population. However, in many ways, rather Mikhail Artemyev should be considered one of the most active initiators of the uprising - he commanded a detachment that took Nelkan and the port of Ayan, and also participated in the direct development of the program foundations of the insurgent movement. Among other local residents, Artemiev was distinguished by his literacy and the presence of a life experience atypical for reindeer herders.

Mikhail Konstantinovich Artemiev was born in 1888 in the Betyunsky nasleg of the Boturus ulus in a peasant family. Unlike many other "foreigners", as the locals were called in tsarist times, Artemyev was lucky - he was able to get an education after graduating from the fourth grade of the Yakut real school. Literacy allowed Mikhail to take the position of a clerk in the Bethune nasleg, and then become the foreman of the Uranai and Bethune tribal administrations. Artemiev managed to work as a teacher in the Amga settlement. Like many educated representatives of the national minorities of Siberia, Artemiev initially supported the establishment of Soviet power. On March 17, 1920, he took the post of volost commissar, and was also chairman of the revolutionary committee. However, rather quickly, Artemiev turned from an active supporter of Soviet power into a participant in the rebel movements. He fought against the Bolsheviks in the rebel detachments of Korobeinikov, then served with General Pepelyaev. The defeat of the Pepelyaevites forced Artemyev to flee to the taiga, where, being in an illegal position, he led the rebel detachment.

About 600 Evenks and Yakuts took part in the Tunguska uprising, there were also a few representatives of the Russian population of the region. From the very beginning of the movement, it took on the character of a political one, since it put forward quite clear political demands - the creation of a national state entity. In the economic area, the participants in the uprising demanded the restoration of the Yakutsk-Okhotsk, Nelkan-Ayan and Nelkan-Ust-Maya tracts, which testified to their desire to improve the financial situation of the Okhotsk Territory and revive its trade and economic ties with Yakutia. At the same time, these requirements would also be beneficial for the economic development of Yakutia, since if these routes were recreated, Yakutia would have the opportunity to trade by sea from the coast of Okhotsk. The seriousness of the rebels' intentions was also confirmed by the adoption of their own tricolor flag, on which the white stripe meant Siberian snow, green - taiga forests, and black - native land.

Thus, the ideology of the rebellion rather satisfied the interests of the Yakut population, since the rebels sought to turn Yakutia into a region with access to the sea through the Okhotsk Territory. In the event that the Soviet government went to satisfy the demands of the rebels for the unification of Yakutia and the Okhotsk Territory, a new union republic would actually be formed, which would greatly strengthen its positions. Naturally, such a national formation, covering a significant part of Eastern Siberia with access to the sea, was not included in the plans of the central leadership of the country - after all, the danger of separatist tendencies was obvious. Especially in that difficult period, when lobbyists for Japanese interests were active in the Far East and Eastern Siberia.

Fighting and surrender of the rebels

After the movement declared its political positions, the Soviet authorities of Yakutia were greatly concerned about the ongoing events. The rebel movement was characterized as a manifestation of banditry and criminality, while the rebels were accused of collaborating with Japanese intelligence agencies interested in destabilizing the situation in Eastern Siberia and the Far East. The Yakut District Executive Committee issued an appeal “To all working Yakuts, Tungus. To the national intelligentsia”, which stated the criminal nature of the insurgency in the Okhotsk Territory. In September 1924, the head of the OGPU of the Okhotsk district, Kuntsevich, sent an OGPU detachment of 45 people under the command of V.A. Abramov. "Abramovtsy" shot three Russian fishermen, three Tungus and one Yakut.

The conflict entered its most active phase at the beginning of 1925. In early February, a cavalry detachment under the command of the famous Strod was sent against the rebels. Thirty-year-old Ivan Yakovlevich Strod (1894-1937) was considered one of the most experienced Red Army commanders in the Far East and Eastern Siberia. In the past, an anarchist and then a supporter of the Soviet regime, Strode replaced the legendary Nestor Kalandarishvili as commander of the cavalry detachment. Although Strod received combat experience even before the start of the Civil War, he participated in the First World War, was awarded the St. George Cross and received the rank of ensign. During the first half of the 1920s. Strode commanded the cavalry detachment named after Kalandarishvili, led the defeat of the White partisan formations of Pepelyaev, Donskoy, Pavlov. It was assumed that an experienced commander, who knew perfectly the tactics of the partisans and smashed the white detachments of the professional military, could easily cope with the Evenk rebels. Indeed, on February 7, 1925, the Strod detachment occupied Petropavlovsk. On the banks of the Aldan, the Evenks, commanded by I. Kanin, clashed with the cavalrymen of Strod. The rebels retreated to Nelkan.

However, on the night of February 21-22, 1925, a detachment of 150 Evenks under the command of P.V. Karamzin managed to capture New Mouth. Although the Evenks were opposed by the Red Army garrison of 317 fighters and commanders armed with seven machine guns, the rebels managed to gain the upper hand and capture the village. After that, the rebels seized goods stored in warehouses, with a total value of 100 thousand rubles in Novy Ustye, 25 thousand rubles in Oymyakon. Naturally, the rebels appropriated the furs stored in the warehouses of Soviet organizations. In relation to the local population, however, many rebels behaved no better than the Soviet leaders, against whom they raised an uprising. So, the fighters of the rebel detachments seized food from the civilian population, took away horses.

Continuing raids in the Okhotsk Territory, on March 4, 1925, the rebels invaded Ust-Maiskoye. A detachment of 50 Red Army soldiers failed to drive them out of the village, after which the Red Army soldiers were forced to retreat, losing nine soldiers dead and eight wounded. But the second operation of the Red Army detachment, this time with 80 fighters and commanders, turned out to be more successful - the rebels retreated from Ust-Maisky. In early April, the Red Army soldiers of Ivan Strod managed to surround a detachment of the rebel S. Kanin of 13 people. Only three rebels managed to escape, two were killed, and the remaining eight, including Kanin, who commanded the detachment, were captured.

Rebel detachment, in the center - Pavel Karamzin

In the meantime, seeing that the use of force to suppress the insurgent movement in the Okhotsk Territory only entails further embitterment of the indigenous population and does not contribute to a radical solution to the problem, the leading bodies of the Soviet government decided to change their policy in the direction of reaching a compromise. Ivan Strod played a significant role in resolving the conflict situation, having studied the psychology and customs of the local population well for many years of life and service in the taiga of Eastern Siberia and the Far East.

Mikhail Artemiev, who with his rebels lodged in Myryla, met with the delegation of the Central Executive Committee of Yakutia led by R.F. Kulakovsky. An armistice agreement was signed, and on April 30, a delegation from the Yakut Central Executive Committee, which included E.I. Sleptsov, F.G. Sivtsev and N. Boldushev. They promised Artemiev that the issue of reuniting the region with Yakutia would be resolved in the near future. The result of the negotiations was the addition of a detachment of M.K. Artemiev on May 9, 1925. Two months later, on July 18, a detachment of another authoritative commander, P.V. Karamzin. Thus, 519 Evenk and Yakut rebels laid down their arms. Since the central Soviet leadership at that time was extremely cautious in resolving issues in the sphere of interethnic relations, local authorities also focused on soft methods in relation to the rebels.

On August 10, 1925, Dalrevkom organized a congress of the Tungus of the Okhotsk coast in Okhotsk, in which delegates from 21 Tungus clans and three Yakut regions took part. On August 23, 1925, a congress of the Main Tunguska National Administration was held in Nelkan, at which representatives of the Soviet government F.G. Sivtsev, T.S. Ivanov and Chairman of the Special Commission of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee K.K. Baikal. As a result of the reports of the Soviet leaders, the Tunguska Administration announced the resignation of its powers and self-dissolution. The importance of resolving the conflict situation peacefully was emphasized. However, K.K. Baikalov, who headed the Special Commission of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, as a result of investigating the causes of the uprising of 1924-1925, concluded that the uprising was provoked by the criminal activities of the authorities of the Okhotsk Territory and employees of the local OGPU.

At the same time, the chairman of the Special Commission of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee also denied accusations of cooperation between the rebels and Japanese and American agents, which had previously been distributed by the Yakut Soviet press.

The representative of the Okhotsk-Yakut military expedition of the OGPU Andreev made the following conclusion about the real reasons for the uprising: “The main reason for the dissatisfaction of the Tungus with the existing government is their terrible impoverishment. The death of deer due to hooves, the invasion of wolves, the pestilence of dogs, the lack of loans from the economic authorities, the illness and high mortality of the Tungus due to the complete lack of medical care, the inability to acquire basic necessities - these reasons together ruined the already low-ranking primitive economy of the Tungus. The error of the local authorities lies in the following: there was no connection with the native population, they were not Soviet workers, but were officials who treated their duties as official, all the circular orders of the center, written for most of the provinces of Soviet Russia, but unsuitable for the Okhotsk Territory , they were blindly put into practice "(Quoted by: T.V. Fonova. Administrative-territorial definition of the village of Nelkan in the 20s - 30s of the last century. Report of the 2nd scientific and practical conference "Meet the Sun!". August 2, 2008).

The participants of the Tunguska uprising were amnestied by the Soviet authorities. Moreover, many rebels were given loans to start a household. This step of the Soviet government was explained by the fact that really impoverished people took part in the uprising, who could hardly be accused of kulaks or bourgeois sentiments. Therefore, the Soviet leadership tried to hush up the conflict and help those Evenks and Yakuts who were in financial distress. Some of the leaders of the uprising were even accepted into the service of Soviet administrative institutions. In particular, Mikhail Artemiev - the most prominent field commander of the Tunguska uprising - even worked as a secretary of the Nelkan volost, then was an interpreter and guide.

"Confederalists". Second rebellion

However, in the future, many former participants in the uprising again turned out to be dissatisfied with the policy of the Soviet government. Despite the fact that the Soviet leadership made promises to satisfy the interests of the indigenous population, in reality the situation has not changed much. Most likely, this is precisely what made Mikhail Artemyev in 1927 join the next uprising that took place in Soviet Yakutia and entered Eastern Siberia as the “xenophonism”, or “confederalist movement”. The Tungus also took part in the "confederalist movement", although for the most part, both in composition and in terms of the goals of the movement, it was focused on the Yakuts. The essence of the confederalist movement was the desire to turn the Yakut ASSR into a union republic, which meant increasing the representation of the Yakuts in the Council of Nationalities of the USSR, the authorities in Yakutia, as well as increasing self-government in the republic. In addition, there was also a nationalist connotation - the Confederalists opposed the settlement of Yakutia by settlers from the European part of Russia, as they saw them as a threat to the economic well-being of the Yakut population. The peasants, who occupied agricultural land, thereby deprived the Yakuts of pastures.

At the origins of the confederalist movement in Yakutia in 1925-1927. stood Pavel Vasilyevich Ksenofontov (1890-1928). Unlike Artemiev, although literate, but with only four classes of a real school behind him, Ksenofontov could be called a real representative of the Siberian intelligentsia. A native of a noble Yakut family, Ksenofontov graduated from the law faculty of Moscow University and in 1925-1927. worked in the People's Commissariat of Finance of the Yakut ASSR. When armed uprisings of the local population began in Yakutia in April 1927, Ksenofontov created the Young Yakut National Soviet Socialist Confederalist Party. In fact, it was her views that determined the main line of the Yakut uprising in 1927. In addition to Ksenofontov, Mikhail Artemyev also stood at the head of the rebels.

Initially, the Confederalists planned to speak out on September 15, but the plans were thwarted by the counterintelligence operations that had begun - P.D. informed the Soviet leadership about the upcoming uprising. Yakovlev, who served as Deputy People's Commissar of Internal Trade of Yakutia. Nevertheless, on September 16, an insurgent detachment was created, led by Ksenofontov, Mikhailov and Omorusov. In October 1927, the rebels under the command of Artemyev occupied Petropavlovsk, including a detachment of 18 local Tungus. Olmarukov's detachment occupied the village of Pokrovsk.

Detachments of Ksenofontov and Artemyev occupied the villages of Ust-Maya, Petropavlovsk, Nelkan, Oymyakon and a number of others. In two months, the uprising covered the territory of five Yakut uluses, and the number of rebels increased to 750 people. At the same time, the occupation of settlements was carried out in fact without real clashes with the Red Army or the police. In order to counter the rebels, back in early October 1927, the Soviet leadership convened an Extraordinary Session of the Yakut Central Executive Committee. It was decided to assign the responsibility for suppressing the uprising to the North-Eastern Expedition of the OGPU. On November 18, Mikhailov's detachment clashed with an OGPU unit.

On December 4, 1927, in the village of Mytattsy, the rebels elected the Central Committee of the Young Yakut National Soviet Socialist Confederalist Party and the general secretary of the party, who became Ksenofontov. The Central Committee of the party included P. Omorusov, G. Afanasiev and six other rebels, the Central Control Commission of the party included I. Kirillov, M. Artemyev and A. Omorusova. On December 16, 1927, the rebels split into several detachments. A detachment of 40 rebels under the command of Mikhailov moved to the East Kangalassky ulus, a detachment of Kirillov and Artemiev of seventy people - to the Dyupsinsky ulus. As they advanced, the rebels gathered the inhabitants of the occupied villages and read appeals to the people in the Yakut and Russian languages. Meanwhile, the OGPU detachments were moving in the footsteps of the rebels. The operation against the Confederalists was commanded by the same Ivan Strod, who had suppressed the Tunguska uprising two years earlier.

Surrender of the Confederates

Like the Tunguska uprising of 1924-1925, the confederalist movement in Yakutia was relatively peaceful. Only ten times during the entire time of the uprising there were skirmishes with Soviet units, serious battles did not follow. The leadership of Soviet Yakutia tried to resolve the conflict situation peacefully and offered Ksenofont's amnesty to him personally, to all leaders and participants in the movement in exchange for laying down arms. Ultimately, Ksenofontov, convinced that the main task of the party is to state the existing problems and its point of view on their solution, on January 1, 1928, laid down his arms. A number of his supporters preferred to “run” with weapons for some more time, but on February 6, 1928, the last rebels capitulated. Although the uprising as a whole did not have a serious scale, and its leaders agreed to voluntary surrender, the Soviet leadership violated the promises of an amnesty.

Ksenofontov and other leaders of the uprising were arrested. On March 27, 1928, the Troika of the OGPU sentenced Pavel Ksenofontov to death, and the next day, March 28, 1928, he was shot. Mikhail Artemyev was shot on March 27, 1928 by the verdict of the Troika. The total number of those arrested in the case of the Ksenofontov uprising was 272 people, of which 128 people were shot, 130 were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and the rest were released. At the same time, the purges also affected the leadership of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, which, in the opinion of the central authorities, could not bring full order to the territory of the republic. In particular, the chairman of the CEC of Yakutia, Maxim Ammosov, and the secretary of the Yakut regional party committee, Isidor Barakhov, were removed from their posts.

The confederalist uprising is one of the most famous examples of organized resistance to Soviet power and its policies in Yakutia. But even later, in the 1930s, there were numerous actions of the indigenous population of Eastern Siberia and the Far East against the Soviet regime. Local residents were not satisfied with the results of collectivization, and they were not satisfied with the policy of the Soviet government, aimed at eliminating traditional religious cults and the usual way of life. On the other hand, the Soviet government, in suppressing such speeches, acted more and more harshly, since the increasingly difficult situation in the country and in the world required increased attention to the observance of the national security interests of the state. Moreover, in the immediate vicinity of Soviet Siberia and the Far East, on the territory of Korea, Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, hostile Japan was actively operating, striving to establish hegemony in the entire Asia-Pacific region.

In May 1924, there was a performance of the Tungus of the Okhotsk district of the Yakut region, caused by outrages and arbitrariness in relation to the Evenks, Evens, Yakuts on the part of the Bolshevik authorities and the organs of the GPU. The Tunguska uprising had a political character, its organizers put forward the creation of the Tunguska Republic as the main demand. After several skirmishes in August 1925, the armed uprising was liquidated peacefully.

With the destruction of the Siberian squad of A.N. Pepelyaev in the summer of 1923, armed uprisings did not end in Yakutia.

In May 1924, the Tungus of the Okhotsk coast acted. In June 1924, the rebels occupied the port of Ayan, in October - the village of Petropavlovskoye, in December - a number of settlements in the vicinity of Okhotsk. There was a real threat of their advance to the central regions.

The main reason for the uprising was the policy of terror of the era of "war communism" against the indigenous population of the Okhotsk coast and the Nelkansky district - the Tungus and Yakuts, by local representatives of the Soviet authorities and the OGPU. During this period, criminal and dubious persons made their way into the leadership of the Okhotsk district - former White Guards, bandits and merchants. Tungus nomads in 1923 were assigned to volosts and subjected to agricultural tax. In addition to agriculture, the nomads paid taxes on deer and dogs, general civil, forest taxes, hunting tax, as well as tax for local needs. In addition, with the advent of Soviet power, they began to collect old debts from the indigenous people, which were registered with them since pre-revolutionary times. In total, the amount of taxes was three times what the nomads paid before the revolution. The actions of local authorities to levy taxes had the character of direct robbery. The trade in furs obtained by fishermen was subject to a large number of formalities, the failure to comply with which was equated with smuggling. In addition, the indigenous peoples had to work out the musher (chase) duty for the transportation of officials, agents of the GPU, police and military detachments. Free trade was limited, interruptions began in the importation of goods, deer were confiscated from private owners. All this led to the impoverishment of the local population.

Also, the Okhotsk authorities persecuted the amnestied former rebels from the Yakuts, Evenks and Evens. There were facts of terrible torture and executions without trial or investigation, which the leadership knew about, but did not take action.

Of the 13,000 Tungus living in the areas covered by the uprising, 600 came out with weapons in their hands. Under the leadership of M.K. Artemiev and P.G. Karamzin (Fig. 2.3) in May-June 1924, Nelkan and the port of Ayan were captured. Following this, in June 1924, a Tungus congress was held in Nelkan, which proclaimed the creation of an independent national state inhabited by Tungus - the Tungus Republic, with its own attributes - a flag and an anthem (Fig. 1). Thus the uprising was political in nature.

Detachments of the Red Army were thrown to suppress the rebels, one of which was cavalry, headed by I.Ya. Strode, an experienced commander who knew perfectly well the tactics of the partisans. After several skirmishes in the summer of 1925, the Tungus uprising was liquidated peacefully on the terms of a complete amnesty for its participants.

The performance of the Tungus forced to pay attention to the small northern peoples. Although work in this direction had already been carried out, in 1924 the Committee for Assistance to the Peoples of the Northern Outskirts was created under the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee. At various times, party leaders E.M. Yaroslavsky, A.V. Lunacharsky, as well as well-known northern scientists V.G. Bogoraz, S.A. Buturlin, B.M. Zhitkov, L.Ya. Sternberg. In 1925 and 1928 The Council of People's Commissars of the USSR adopted resolutions on substantial tax benefits and, in some cases, on complete exemption from taxes for the peoples of the North.

Fig.1. Flag of the Tunguska Republic. Fig.2. Commanders of the Tungus detachments. In the top row, 2nd from the left is Pavel Karamzin.
Fig.3. Mikhail Artemiev - one of the leaders of the Tunguska uprising. Fig.4. Members of the Council of People's Commissars of the Yakut ASSR with amnestied rebel leaders in 1925

Place

Khabarovsk region

Cause

tax policy of the Soviet government

Outcome

peace agreement, amnesty for rebels

Changes

Lua error in Module:Wikidata on line 170: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Opponents Commanders Side forces Losses

Tunguska uprising 1924-1925 - armed uprising of rebels from representatives of the indigenous peoples of the North in Yakutia and the regions of the North-East.

Course of events

The uprising was caused by unjustified actions of local authorities: the closure of ports for foreign trade, the restriction of trade, interruptions in the importation of goods from the mainland, the confiscation of deer from private owners, the withdrawal of vast pastures for industrial new buildings.

In May 1924, the rebels occupied the village of Nelkan, which became the base of the rebels. A group of up to 300 armed people was stationed here. In June the port of Ayan was taken.

At the congress of the Ayan-Nelkan, Okhotsk-Ayan and Maimakan Tungus and Yakuts, the Provisional Central Tungus National Administration was elected, which decided to secede from the RSFSR. M. K. Artemiev became the chief of staff of the armed detachments, and the Tungus P. G. Karamzin from a prominent Evenk princely family became the head of the detachments.

Rebel detachments of Yakuts, Tunguses (Evens) and partially Russians operated in the Ayano-Nelkano-Aldan, Okhotsk, Oymyakon-Verkhoyansk regions of Yakutia, in Abye.

In 1925, the rebels concluded a truce with the Soviet authorities and laid down their arms. Many prominent rebels were included in the Soviet governing bodies.

In 1927, the policy of "tightening the screws" began, as a result of which, within a year, the former leaders of the uprising were repressed, many were executed.

Write a review on the article "Tunguska uprising"

Notes

Literature

Kovlekov S. I., Boyakova S. I.. - Yakutsk: YaGU Publishing House, 2005. - ISBN 5-8176-0051-X, ISBN 978-5-8176-0051-3.

View this template

Leaders of the uprisings

Organizations involved in the uprisings

uprisings

Coat of arms of the USSR

This article about the Soviet Union is a stub. You can help the project by adding to it.

An excerpt characterizing the Tunguska uprising

At first, Leah was stunned by the unexpected happiness that fell on her, and then, unable to say anything, she nodded her head so strongly that she almost threatened to fall off ...
Saying goodbye to the joyful family, we moved on.
It was incredibly pleasant to feel safe again, to see the same joyful light flooding everything around, and not be afraid to be unexpectedly seized by some terrible, nightmarish horror movie ...
- Do you want to go for a walk? Stella asked in a completely fresh voice.
The temptation, of course, was great, but I was already so tired that even if the greatest miracle on earth seemed to me now, I probably would not be able to truly enjoy it ...
- Well, next time! Stella laughed. - I am also tired.
And then, somehow, our cemetery appeared again, where, on the same bench, our grandmothers were sitting side by side...
– Do you want to show me something?... – Stella asked quietly.
And suddenly, instead of grandmothers, incredibly beautiful, brightly shining entities appeared ... Both of them had amazing stars sparkling on their chests, and an amazing miracle crown shone and shimmered on Stella's grandmother's head ...
“It’s them… You wanted to see them, didn’t you?” I nodded dumbfounded. “Don’t tell me what I showed you, let them do it themselves.”
“Well, now I have to go ...” the little girl whispered sadly. – I can’t go with you... I can’t go there anymore...
- I will definitely come to you! Many, many more times! I promised with all my heart.
And the little girl looked after me with her warm sad eyes, and it seemed that she understood everything ... Everything that I could not tell her with our simple words.

All the way home from the cemetery, for no reason, I was pouting at my grandmother, and, moreover, angry with myself for it ... I looked a lot like a ruffled sparrow, and my grandmother saw it perfectly, which, of course, irritated me even more and made me crawl deeper into her “safe shell” .... Most likely, it was just my childhood resentment raging because, as it turned out, she hid a lot from me and did not teach anything yet, apparently considering me unworthy or incapable of more. And although my inner voice told me that I was all around and completely wrong, I could not calm down and look at everything from the outside, as I did before, when I thought that I could be wrong ...
Finally, my impatient soul was unable to endure silence any longer...
“Well, what did you talk about for so long?” If, of course, I can know this ... - I grumbled offendedly.
“But we didn’t talk - we thought,” grandmother answered calmly smiling.
It seemed that she was just teasing me in order to provoke me into some actions that were understandable to her alone ...
- Well, then, what were you “thinking” about there? - and then, unable to stand it, she blurted out: - Why does grandmother teach Stella, but you don’t teach me?! .. Or do you think that I am no longer capable of anything?